For those interested in my novel, there are some important
things that I should point out. Although it’s a fictional story, a lot of
research went into my book involving the biblical and scientific studies of the
Shroud. However, looking for these documents relating to the Second Coming of
God was somewhat sketchy back in the day, but not incomplete. With enough
effort, my studies were able to maintain a sizable story from it. Anyway, I’ll
explain all of that later in this statement. For now, let me tell you the
things that I stumbled upon during my research.Stunned,
to say the least, a new generation of archaeologists and historians has come up
with some hard evidence pointing to the Exodus, the walls of Jericho, and the
palace of King David.
From the
early twenties to the turn of the century has proven the Exodus and the walls
of Jericho to have never occurred. However, like the Shroud of Turin, these
scholars of the new era have uncovered recent discoveries that debunks these findings.
That is, it points to the Exodus and the walls of Jericho with hard evidence.
Mind you, each of these discoveries didn’t go without detailed information,
involving a lot of exhausting research. And for some reason, they’ve been kept
under the public’s radar. By no means is this a UFO/Big Foot documentary with
empty verifications, but a valid report from reliable sources. For the evidence
is truly buried in the ground.
The Exodus
occurred two-hundred years before the reign of Ramesses II - Not during. This
discovery involves the Egyptian and Biblical chronometer. It turns out that
either the Egyptian chronometer is off by two-hundred years, or the Israelites’
chronometer is simply a separate time of its own. This conflict is still being
debated. However, it’s not where the Exodus occurred, but when it occurred. And
when looking two-hundred years before Ramesses II, the proof is in a small
village inside of Canaan. Evidence of the Israelites can then be found everywhere
in this time period. Also, a statement written in one of the scrolls is
misunderstood, describing the Israelites to Ramses II. The author who added this
sentence into the older scroll at a later time described the location to be in
the land of Goshen, and not during
the time of Ramses. He was using Ramses's name to identify the location for
those who didn’t know the land of Goshen at that time. I’ve even
discovered a video documentary on it ⸺ https://tubitv.com/movies/500738/patterns-of-evidence-exodus
Did the walls
of Jericho fall ⸺ Yes and No. This is a power pull by both historians making
claims against the other. However, there’s too much evidence describing that
event in which the bible recorded. Fact; they found the fortified structure to
indeed have collapsed. The entire wall fell with the exception of one section
leaving a room untouched as described in the bible. Experts can’t explain how this
could have happened but did say it was quick. Some believe it to be an
Earthquake, but have no proof of this ⸺ no seismic activities in the region,
only along the Jordanian desert which is miles away and a distant time apart. And
again, keep in mind that the Egyptian chronometer is off by two-hundred years
from the bible ⸺ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_HGbty_PEE
King David’s
palace, the
third king of the United Kingdom of Israel has been discovered by a woman name
Eilat Mazar. Overwhelming evidence points to this unearthing, which has the
older generation in archaeology corrected. Not long ago, it was said to be a
myth about some made-up story by the Israelites. However, this is no longer
true. As a result, I needn’t say any more on this subject ⸺ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMlDwcCivC4
And finally,
there’s overwhelming evidence that the Shroud of Turin is authentic. Yes, it’s
true that a carbon 14 testing showed the shroud to be only a little over seven-hundred
years old. And no, it’s not a valid examination due to the cloth skewed by cotton
used in 1293 to repair the sample area on the Shroud. There’s mounting evidence
today of an already proven relic describing its authenticity. Two key players to
zero in on is a scientist in imagery named, Barry Schwortz, and particle physicist,
Isabel Helen Piczek. And although there are many more scientists who back up
the authenticity of the shroud, both are respectable individuals in their fields
⸺ https://odysee.com/@thysecondcoming:e/the-shroud-of-turin-god-s-calling-card:b
My research in these discoveries has
brought me to this remarkable video in the collection of Archaeologists, Historians,
Apologetics, and Theologiansproving the history of the bible to be accurate
in time and location.
The question is: Did any of these
findings change my outlook on religion ⸺ Yes, they did.
: And did they
strengthen my faith in God – You better believe it ⸺